site cracking
Trying to hack into a system you don't own is likely illegal in your jurisdiction (plus hacking your own system). Piping can [also quite often] violate any warranty on the product that torments you).
Let's start with the basics. What is a brute-force attack?
This type of attack links multiple attempts to enter the pipeline as a user, trying all combinations of letters, numbers and symbols (using automated tools).
This is easy to do online (thus in real time, constantly trying different combinations of username and password in accounts such as social networks or banking resources - never after downloading (in case you are in possession of a set of hashed passwords and are trying to crack the packet offline).
In offline mode, none of this is possible anyway (sometimes it's problematic to find a set of hashed passwords), but it's significantly less noisy. Could be due to something that the security team will probably notice many failed attempts to access the same account, but if you can open the password offline, you will not have a record of unsuccessful attempts trying to login.
<> it's relatively easy - with a short password. This will be exponentially more difficult with a very long password due to the many possibilities.
For example, in the case where you know a person is using a 5-character password made entirely of lowercase letters, the total 26^5 possible passwords (26 existing suggestions for the first letter, 26 possible ways for the second letter, etc.), forum crack or 11,881,376 possible combinations.
But if someone uses an 11-character all-lowercase password, the total number of possible passwords is 26 ^11, or 3,670,344,486,987,776 possible passwords.
When you add capital letters, special characters and numbers, it will be even more difficult and energy intensive to hack. The tougher the possible passwords, the harder it is for the latter to successfully enter the pipeline using brute force.
How to protect yourself
This type of attack can be eliminated in several ways. First of all, you have the opportunity to use sufficiently long and complex passwords (at least 15 characters). You can also design your own logins for each account (use a password manager!) To reduce the risk of information being leaked.
The security team can lock an account after a certain number of failed attempts to open the system. . They can, among other things, use a secondary verification method such as captcha, or use two-factor authentication (2fa), which requires a second code (sms or email, based on applications or based on a hardware key).
Here is an article on how to perform a brute-force attack.
How can you crack passwords faster?
A dictionary attack consists of a login attempt using the number of combinations included in a pre-compiled "dictionary" or list of combinations.
This is usually faster than a brute-force attack, since the combinations of letters and numbers have already been calculated, which saves you effort and computation power.
But if the master password is complex enough (for example, 1098324ukjbfnsdfsnej) and is not in the "dictionary" (a precompiled list of combinations you're working with), the attack won't work.
It crackingx com often happens to be successful, since often when l people choose passwords, they choose common words or variants of these words (eg 'passwo rd' or 'p@ssword').
A hacker can also devise a similar attack if he knows or guesses part of the password (for example, the name of a dog, name day of babies or an anniversary - data, then a hacker can find it on social networking pages or other resources with open source code).
Protection measures similar to those described above from brute-force attacks can prevent the success of these varieties of attacks. .
What if you personally already have a list of hashed passwords?
Passwords are stored in the /etc/shadow file for linux and c:\windows\ system32\config for windows (which are not available during the os boot process).
If you managed to get this file or if you have a password hash in another way, for example listening to traffic on the internet, you can experience hack account "offline".
While the attacks described above require repeated login attempts, even if there is a list of hashed passwords, you can try to hack stuff on your machine without disabling the warnings generated by repeated failed login attempts. System. Then you're looking to be logged in only once, once you've successfully cracked the mail, and so there are no failed login attempts).
You can use brute force or dictionary attacks against the hash -rollers, and this can be successful based on how reliable the hash is.
Wait a minute - what hashes?
35d4ffef6ef231d998c6046764bb935d
Recognized this message? It says "hi, my name is megan"
7dbda24a2d10daf98f23b95cfaf1d3ab
This is the first paragraph of this article. Yes, it looks like nonsense, but it's actually a "hash".
A hash function allows a computer to input a string (some combination of letters, numbers, and symbols), take that string, shuffle it, and output a fixed length string. That's why both of the above strings are the same length, even though the input strings were of very different lengths.
Hashes can be created from almost any digital content. For the most part, all digital content can be converted into a binary password or into a sequence of zeros and ones. Thus, all digital content (images, documents, etc.) Can be hashed.
There are many different hash functions, some of which are more secure than 2d. The above hashes were generated using md5 (md stands for "message digest"). Different functions also differ in one side of the hash accessory they produce.
The same content in the same hash function will produce the same hash every second. However, even a small change will completely change the hash. For example,
2ff5e24f6735b7564cae7020b41c80f1
This is the hash for "hi, my name is megan". >
Hashes are also one-way functions (meaning they cannot be reversed). This means that hashes (unique and one-way) are used as a digital fingerprint for the content.
An example of using hashes?
<>hashes can be used to confirm that a message has not been changed.
For example, when you send an email, you have the option to hash the entire email and send the hash as well. The recipient can then run the received message through the same hash function to check if the message was tampered with upon receipt. If the two hashes match, the message has not been modified. If they don't match, the message has been changed.
Also, passwords are usually hashed when stored. When the client enters his password, the computer calculates the hash value and compares it with the stored hash value. With this, the device does not store passwords in free form (so some curious hacker can't steal them!).
If a careless student can steal the password file, the data is useless, as cannot be reversed (although there are ways, like rainbow tables, to figure out which plaintext produces a known hash).
What's wrong with hashes?
If a hash can accept information of any length or content, then there are unlimited possibilities for data that is easy to hash.
Because a hash converts this text into fixed length content (e.G. , 32 characters), there is a finite number of combinations for a hash. This is an extremely limitless number of possibilities, unfortunately not infinite.
Ultimately, two different data sets will give the same hash value. This is called a collision.
If you have a single hash and the viewers are trying to observe all the likely meanings of the clear translation, then finding the plaintext that matches your hash will take hours, a rather difficult process.
However, what if you still care what two hashes collide?
In mathematics, the so-called "birthday problem". Out of 23 students, the probability that someone has a birthday on a particular day is approximately 7%, but the probability that any two people have the same name day is less than 50%.
This same kind of information analysis is applied to hash functions to find any two hashes that match (instead of a specific hash that matches another).
To avoid this, you can exploit a longer function hash , like sha3, there is less luck for conflicts.
You can implement create your own eyelashes hash functions for sha3 here and md5 here.
You can try brute force hashes, but it will take quite a long time. A faster way to do this is to use precomputed rainbow tables (which are adequate for dictionary attacks).
It seems easy to hack into your clients. Should i be worried?
The most important thing to remember about the autopsy is that no one is willing to do more work than they should. For example, iterating over hashes can turn out to be very time consuming and time consuming. If there is an easier method to get your code, then an attacker is likely to try it especially.
This means that using basic cybersecurity best practices is probably the easiest technique to prevent hacking. In fact, microsoft recently reported that simply enabling two-factor authentication blocks 99.9% of automated attacks.